|
| 医学微生物学大型课堂教学中辅助教学方法的比较研究 |
| Comparative Study of Auxiliary Teaching Methods in Large-Scale Classroom Teaching of Medical Microbiology |
| |
| DOI：doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7021.2025.01.016 |
| 中文关键词: 医学微生物学 大型课堂教学 辅助教学方法 教学视频法 同伴讨论法 比较研究 |
| 英文关键词: Medical Microbiology large-scale classroom teaching auxiliary teaching method teaching video method peer discussion method comparative study |
| 基金项目:陕西省科学技术协会“省级学会科普惠三秦”项目（2024-3-2-2） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 24 |
| 全文下载次数: 3 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为比较医学微生物学大型课堂教学过程中两种不同辅助教学方法所取得的教学效果的差异，在针对三部分教学内容的4个课时的教学过程中，教师对两班本科生（人数分别为215人和204人）首先均采用“依据幻灯片进行讲授法”为主要教学方法、然后分别采用“教学视频法”或“同伴讨论法”为辅助教学方法开展教学活动。随后，就教学内容中7个重点知识对学生进行评估测试，以量化比较两种辅助教学方法在教学效果上的差别。发现采用教学视频法为辅助教学方法的班级学生平均成绩高于采用同伴讨论法。问卷调查显示，学生课堂以外的学习习惯对学习成绩无显著影响，说明课堂学习仍是学生学习医学微生物学知识的主渠道，教学方法对提高教学效果有重要影响。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to compare the teaching effects achieved in two different auxiliary teaching methods in large-scale classroom teaching process of Medical Microbiology, in teaching process of 4 class hours for 3 teaching contents, the teachers first adopted "teaching method based on slide show" as the main teaching method in both classes, and then adopted "teaching video method" or "peer discussion method" as the auxiliary teaching method for the two classes of undergraduates (215 and 204 students) respectively. Then, the students were evaluated on seven aspects of key knowledge in the teaching content to quantitatively compare the difference in teaching effect between the two auxiliary teaching methods. It is found that the average score of students in the class using teaching video method is higher than that using peer discussion method. The questionnaire survey showed that students′ learning habits outside the classroom had no significant impact on their academic performance, indicating that classroom learning was still the main channel for students to learn Medical Microbiology knowledge, and teaching methods had important impact on improving the teaching effect. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
